Blogstream   -   Create a Blog!   -   Login Chat   -   Options   -   Clean   -   Flag   -   Family Filter: Off   -   Recent   -   Rndm >>    

Blogstream  >  Anything  >  Blog  >  Post #105328
 
Potatoes


 The Evolution Of A Creationist
Back to Full Blog  

Today me, {idiot}, and my friend from the Religious Right, {RR}, thought we'd discuss the debate over Evolution versus Creation; what should be taught in the classroom?

idiot: Obvious question, what do you think should be in our textbooks?

RR: Obvious answer, creation.

idiot: But since the theory of creation is religious, and we have separation of church and state, how would you justify that position?

RR: That's such a loaded question...

idiot: That's why I get paid the big bucks!

RR: Okay, first of all, creation isn't a theory, it's fact; recorded in Genesis, which was written long ago. It's not just religious, a majority of the scientific community accepts it. Also, "separation of church and state" is not even in the constitution.

idiot: Some would say the account of creation in Genesis is purely allegorical.

RR: "Some" would be wrong.

idiot: So you're saying all of creation happened in six days?

RR: No, that's what the Bible says.

idiot: Would you be willing to accept both evolution and creation to be taught side by side?

RR: When I was younger, I might have said yes; but now I would say no.

idiot: Wow, you don't even believe they should get "equal time"?

RR: No, because evolution isn't even a valid theory anymore. If "survival of the fittest" were true, and man is highest on the food chain, there would be no other species on the planet. Also, if life "mutates", as they call it, why haven't we seen a carp walk out from the ocean, and onto the beach?

idiot: So you're saying that our tax dollars should never pay for any textbook that has the word, "evolution" in it?

RR: Of course not, english teachers sometimes use science fiction books.

Commercial break.

Posted by idiot at 2:47 AM - 15 Comments   Add a Comment  
  Hide Post  
Next Post
 
Comments:

That is truly a screwy affair.

I think the problem is, our Country based the Constitution on a United States that would be religiously free-yet they based many of their rules on religious texts.

They knew some religious texts had good ideas, but they didn't think of what could possibly happen 200+ years down the road.

The US of today isn't even really devout in any sort of religion. We're a country that has a doctrine telling it to do one thing, and then it goes and does something else.

Kinda like....hmm...oh, here we go: It's kind of like parenting. Rules have to change as a child grows. You can't tell a child that it can drive when it's only 10 years old. Yet, at the same time, when that child is 16, you can't tell the child it's nap time.

Same as our country. You can't expect our mindset to be the same as that of our ancestors. Our ancestors were doing what we are now: revolting against rules that no longer fit their maturity. We're doing some growing up now, as a country, and we're confused. We have one foot firmly stuck in the rigid system laid down some 200 years ago, and one foot hovering over a dark black hole that leads to an unknown place. America is scared, and is somewhat clinging to it's old doctrines. We're in-between a comfortable place that works, and it's messing us up. It's gonna come to a point where we have to decide where religion stands in our country, and where the Government stands, and then keep it that way, for the time being. We've evolved past the religious mindset that EVERYONE had back when this country started, and we don't all think the same way anymore. Heck, some of us don't even believe in a God.

We're a messed up country. Oy vey.
 
|<   <<   >>   >|

 
by Stephanie (PM , CC ) on Tuesday July 25, 2006 @ 3:54 AM




Hi, Stephanie! I think your right; America is scared. Those who have, are scared of losing it; and those who don't have, are scared they'll never get it. By "it", I mean either power, or wealth, or even just getting their own way.
 
|<   <<   >>   >|

 
by idiot (PM , CC ) on Tuesday July 25, 2006 @ 4:19 AM




Was this person just a fundie or were they mentally retarded as well? A majority of the scientific community accepts creation? Really? Last I had heard ninety five percent of those in relevant fields i.e. biology, chemistry, physics, geology, accept the theory of evolution as the one and only scientific explanation for the life we see on the planet today. When people start saying things as stupid as "If "survival of the fittest" were true, and man is highest on the food chain, there would be no other species on the planet." and "Also, if life "mutates", as they call it, why haven't we seen a carp walk out from the ocean, and onto the beach?" all conversation on the subject should cease until the ignorant party takes the time to learn what the theory of evolution actually predicts. You can't discuss science with someone who doesn't even understand what science is.  
|<   <<   >>   >|

 
by The Vessel (PM , CC ) on Wednesday July 26, 2006 @ 1:23 PM




perhaps an explanation should be shared- I know I'd like all the facts!  
|<   <<   >>   >|

 
by Stephanie (PM , CC ) on Wednesday July 26, 2006 @ 8:41 PM




Darwin simply had to qualify the long time and great expense he incurred while screwing off in the name of the Queen.What better than a smokescreen like evolution"theory".Anyone that feels nice about having primordial slime as a forefather needs to do some independent thinking. TCBS BC  
|<   <<   >>   >|

 
by BigChris (PM , CC ) on Wednesday July 26, 2006 @ 8:50 PM




"Feels nice about having primordial ooze as a forefather"? What does feeling nice have to do with it? Should we limit our knowledge to what feels nice? Maybe we should just say the sun is actually a big warm hug? Yes, yes, science should definitely be based on what feels nice. Forget experimentation, data, conclusions, let's go with warm and snuggly feelings as the basis of our knowledge.

And Darwin, yeah, Darwin, that guy the fundies like to throw ridiculous and deceitful insults at to try and discredit what is one of the best supported theories in all of science. I think these people actually believe that all evolutionary discovery stopped with Darwin's observations. Forget the hundred plus years that have followed where we have again and again put the theory of evolution to the test and seen it come through with flying colors, above and beyond all expectations.

This is the problem with the education system in the U.S.. The facts of the theory of evolution should be common knowledge, but they are not. People are learning their "science" from their religious leaders and fundy websites, and as a result we are woefully behind Western European and Asian nations in the fields of science and mathematics. We are raising a country of backwoods doofi. When will the religious right realize they are poisining the well and that soon we will have nothing worth drawing from it?

Let the religious leaders teach all the warm fuzzy they want in the church, but make sure the children hear from the scientists where science is concerned. You don't see scientists performing baptisms, do you?
 
|<   <<   >>   >|

 
by The Vessel (PM , CC ) on Wednesday July 26, 2006 @ 10:37 PM




Good point, Vessel: You don't see scientists performing baptisms, do you?  
|<   <<   >>   >|

 
by idiot (PM , CC ) on Wednesday July 26, 2006 @ 10:46 PM




"Anyone that feels nice about having primordial slime as a forefather needs to do some independent thinking."

Hmmmm, so what is that 'molded from the dust of the earth and quickened with the breath of God' stuff (stated in various ways) all about? And do you ACTUALLY believe I'm part of your rib cage? ROTFL

It would appear to me that the biblical creationism tale, "In the beginning", was simply based upon what scribes used to forego the system of evolution, of which they were so sorrowfully ignorant.

It's about 'power' and 'control'. IMO Then, now and always, the masses are fed 'what feels good' to keep them in their place.

Myself? I can live with primordial slime--just don't give me any edification on Eden. ROTFL
 
|<   <<   >>   >|

 
by Nancy (PM , CC ) on Saturday July 29, 2006 @ 2:58 PM




Hi, Nancy! I also find it hard to accept many parts of the Bible that seem to come across as fairy tales. The problem I have is, when I ask the question, "How did I get here?", eventually you get down to, "Where did the first atom of physical reality come from?"  
|<   <<   >>   >|

 
by idiot (PM , CC ) on Saturday July 29, 2006 @ 3:20 PM




Idiot;

Yeah that first energy/matter is hard to reconcile, but how much harder is it to reconcile that first matter plus an infinite being of infinite knowledge and his origins as well. Adding a god to the equation doesn't make it any easier to understand how the first matter/energy came into existence. Scientists use something called Occam's razor which basically says, when confronted with two possiblities the least complicated should always be considered most reasonable until proven otherwise. In this case, matter coming into existence from unknown origins is far more reasonable than an infinite being coming into existence from unknown origins and then causing matter to come into existence from unknown origins.

String theory actually postulates some fairly shaky premises for the beginning of the beginning, but as of yet there is no solid theory. There very likely never will be. Still, a god in no way helps to make sense out of anything.
 
|<   <<   >>   >|

 
by The Vessel (PM , CC ) on Saturday July 29, 2006 @ 3:29 PM




Thanks, Vessel. I had heard of Occam's razor before, but I forgot about it. I am curious about string theory.  
|<   <<   >>   >|

 
by idiot (PM , CC ) on Saturday July 29, 2006 @ 5:54 PM




A good article on string theory is here. If you want a much more in depth read that is fairly easy to understand Brian Greene's book The Fabric of The Cosmos is an excellent read. Its one of those books that will just make you go, Wow!  
|<   <<   >>   >|

 
by The Vessel (PM , CC ) on Saturday July 29, 2006 @ 6:44 PM




Sometimes it seems that man puts too much emphasis on 'earth' and our earthly origins. There's a whole lot of space out there--and one can say that it was 'created' by God or a Big Bang. And of course, 'who/what' began it all?

Of course, there may be creatures that evolved somewhere out there, and who are we not to believe that they are the original "Adam & Eve" and we are the product of their banishment from their 'Eden'? (I like fairy tales just like the next person, you know? lol)

Not to be denied its place in any discussion of who/what/where we came from is that ever ringing bell that everything, everywhere, is part of the source. We are just putting our time in here until we return. Maybe?
 
|<   <<   >>   >|

 
by Nancy (PM , CC ) on Saturday July 29, 2006 @ 11:18 PM




Vessel, thanks for pointing me to that article; fascinating stuff!  
|<   <<   >>   >|

 
by idiot (PM , CC ) on Sunday July 30, 2006 @ 9:39 PM




Nancy, thanks. Maybe we're just not smart enough to ever figure this stuff out.  
|<   <<   >>   >|

 
by idiot (PM , CC ) on Sunday July 30, 2006 @ 9:42 PM


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

   
  About Me
Author: idiot
 
This blog is about...
Conversations between me, {idiot}, and a member of the Religious Right,{RR}.
 
My: Profile  Gallery 
 
Bookmark   History

  Blogstream Sponsors
Have you checked out the new Blogstream site,

Question Stream.com?

Many Blogstream members are there already! Quotes from members: "It's like blog lite!" -- "I like the instant gratification!" -- "Stop spectating, get in the game!"

If you have not joined in, you are really missing out!

Send Free
Just Saying Hi
Greeting Cards
at

Greeting Cards.com


Good Morning


  Recent Posts
...more

  Blogs I Like

  Archives

387 Visitors